Bernice Murphy, Prismatic realities: an introduction to Anna Oppermann,
in brochure: Paradoxical Intentions, Sydney 1994
For twenty-five years of her life as an artist (brought to a halt
by her untimely death in 1993) Anna Oppermann developed a special
and characteristic mode of working. This involved the generation
of a huge body of complex installational work, which the artist
preferred to define by the term ensembles.
Although she began as an academically trained painter, and indeed
retained immensely refined abilities as a painter throughout her
career as an artist, the ensemble - as an enveloping mode of production
and vision - is what distinguishes Anna Oppermann's mature work.
The ensemble provided persistent structural impulses within her
work's evolving character and particularity over two and a half
decades.
The ensembles evolved from a foundational corner-format of a domestic
interior. They developed originally from a photographic view,
taken of small still-life notations - in drawings and objects
- in situ near a window, in her apartment in Hamburg. The ensembles
became ever more layered in time, as well as in spatial complexity
and formally differentiated but interconnecting elements. There
were always crucial aspects leading beyond technical considerations,
however, in the emergence of the installational format in Anna
Oppermann's work. These had to do with the articulation of a particular
psychological and philosophical complexity in her rendition of
the world, rather than the mere deployment of informal materials
and heterogeneous elements in a novel way.
It is important to stress that, around 1968 (at a time when the
idea of feminist concerns in art faced the most severe challenges
in the German art establishment) Anna Oppermann began to work
in a specific way with the domestic interior. Ideas of the personal
and social identities of women, as well as intimate objects around
her, provided much of Oppermann's subject matter. She worked with
an intense exploration and inwardness (in fact in her own living
space of the kitchen, with a young child nearby) as a context
for definition of the crucial elements of self-identity, daily
work, personal and social relations.
Through this precisely explored, domestic context, she undertook
a difficult task of accumulating and articulating these relations
in her work, by means of overlapping imagery in which the images
and physical elements jostle and converge, and at the same time
disturb and refract apart from each other. Anna Oppermann also
engaged a larger framework of ideas. Her analysis moved outwards,
towards a quite profound dimension of defining the larger world
and its scaffolding of concepts, categories, histories and determining
forces - as these structure the life, and the intellectual and
cultural landscape, of an individual.
'Being a housewife'; 'Cucumbers and tomatoes';
'Being a woman'; 'Women as angels', as well as
'Being an artist': these are some of the themes Anna Oppermann
crystallised years later when reviewing and editing the evident
subject matter of her work of the late 1960s and early 1970s,
during preparation of a large monograph for publication in 1984
(to accompany an exhibition in Hamburg).
Although these themes were not yet used as specific titles for
installations, which began to emerge in the public sphere as fully
defined ensembles in the early 1970s, a generalisation and abstraction
of the philosophical undercurrent of her works did emerge as a
theme by the mid-1970s. For example, To be different [or, To be other] appeared as the title to an
already complex ensemble installed at the Kunstverein in Hamburg
(her home city) in 1975 - and this superscription continued as
the governing title of the reinstalled (and vastly altered, more
ramifying) installations of her work at the 1980 Biennale of Venice,
and in 1981 at the Serpentine Gallery, London. A 1984 installation
at the fifth Biennale of Sydney (directed by Leon Paroissien)
introduced this highly evolved form of Oppermann's installations
to Australian audiences.
It is important to emphasize, however, that Anna Oppermann always
viewed political art - and especially the traps of utopianism
or didacticism - with the utmost caution. As her work progressed,
and increased in scale and complexity, her installations developed
the political and economic aspects more overtly - often augmented
by texts that interlaced the social cross-threading of her subject
matter. However the personal and the universal were always sought
as constantly interpenetrating possibilities in all of Oppermann's
thematising of social or political materials. She had an unswerving
disdain for an over-determined, programmatic approach to the complexity
of the political and social potential of art.
Another important component of the earliest installation works
of Anna Oppermann - and philosophically inflecting their strands
of perception and meaning - arose through the use of the mirror.
'For me the mirror - the breaching of the borders of reality -
was a key experience', the artist stated in 1984.(1). The mirror, with the accompanying and recurrent aid of photographic
reproductions, continued as motif, element and visual syntax through
out Anna Oppermann's development of ensembles, at many sites and
in various countries throughout the 1980s and 1990s. By the early
1990s, the complex prismatic effects of mirroring (in perceptual
and physical aspects) and doubling (in terms of psychological
and philosophical dimensions of meaning) had escalated throughout
the artist's work to intense levels of density.
The text that follows in this catalogue, written especially for
the exhibition by Ines Lindner, an art historian in Berlin, goes
on to discuss the prismatic, oscillating effects of physical encounter
and meaning in Anna Oppermann's work in greater depth, through
detailed discussion of the installation, Paradoxical Intentions. Ines Lindner's text also refers back to the continuous, cumulative
body of work by Oppermann - like an immense, unfolding archiveof
great intellectual challenge and intimate physical beauty - from
which this special installation for Australia has been detached.
The installation was prepared by the artist, through use of a
scale-model of the gallery room where it would appear in the MCA
in Sydney, during the months before Anna Oppermann finally lost
her struggle against the effects of cancer and died in March 1993.
The installation for Sydney, while being able to be viewed as
a detachment, complete in itself, should also be understood in
its open-ended character, in its itineraries of connection to
a more complex history: the history of Anna Oppermann's work,
and of her links to the larger social and intellectual body of
German (and European) art as she experienced these in her lifetime.
To gain its full meaning, therefore, this installation seeks ultimately
to be reunited to the enveloping, multifaceted project that was
Anna Oppermann's life's work as an artist.
Notes:
(1) Anna Oppermann Ensembles 1968-1984 [pub. eds. H. Hossmann & A.Oppermann],
Hamburg and Brussels, Lebeer Hossmann, 1984, p.36
[top of page]